Our team
Built by people who care about how drawing coordination actually works on live projects.
Coorda is being shaped as an engineering delivery workspace: register first, review with structure, then move into decisions, RFIs, tasks, and issue packs without losing the record.
What we are building
Register
Current revision clarity
Know what is live, what changed, and what is ready to review.
Check + Align
Actionable review
Surface evidence, options, unknowns, and next actions instead of vague flags.
Issue
Controlled delivery
Send professional packs with revision snapshots, references, and history.
Product stance
We are not trying to replace engineering judgement. We are trying to make the project record clearer, the review process faster, and the issue workflow more defensible.
Engineering-led product thinking
Coorda is shaped around live drawing packages, revision control, review outputs, RFIs, decisions, and issue stage delivery rather than generic project software patterns.
AI where it helps, human control where it matters
Metadata extraction, Check, and Align are there to accelerate review. Final judgement, approvals, and issue responsibility stay with the project team.
Traceability as a default, not an add-on
The platform is built so comments, checks, decisions, RFIs, tasks, and issue sheets stay tied back to the right revision and project context.
How we think about Coorda
The product is organised around the real delivery chain
01
Build the live register
Upload drawings, extract metadata, group revisions, and make it obvious what is current, superseded, ready for Check, ready for Align, or blocked.
02
Review with structure
Use Check and Align to turn drawings and schedules into practical review outputs with evidence, options, confidence, and direct next actions.
03
Deliver from the same workspace
Move into RFIs, decisions, tasks, comments, and issue packs without rebuilding the same information in emails, spreadsheets, and external trackers.
Who we serve
Teams working from live drawing information
Building services consultants
M&E contractors
Project and design managers
Teams running healthcare, commercial, education, and complex coordination-heavy projects
Why this matters
Less rebuilding. More confidence at issue stage.
Without structure
Teams spend time rebuilding registers, tracking revisions by eye, and stitching issue packs together manually.
With Coorda
The live set, the review output, and the delivery pack stay connected in one workspace.
Typical pressure point
Review information is often lost between comments, RFIs, decision logs, and outgoing issue sheets.
Typical outcome
Better revision control, cleaner audit trails, and more professional project outputs.
Next step
If your workflow starts with drawings, Coorda should feel familiar.
Start a project, upload a live set, and see the register, Check, Align, and issue workflow form around the actual project record.
